Your session has been flagged for unusual activity.
Please confirm you're human to continue.
The tool that drafts, summarises and reviews — without inventing case law if you use it correctly.
No credit card · ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity in one place
You already do half of this by hand: ask one model, paste the answer into another to check it. Here is what that turned up on a real task for lawyers.
Summarise the indemnity risk in this master services agreement.
Auto Verification caught
The statute was cited in its pre-amendment form.
The models disagreed
One model read the gross-negligence carve-out as capping liability.
Another read the same words as leaving it uncapped.
If two models split on a clause, so will opposing counsel. That is the clause to negotiate.
Paste the transcript (or upload). Ask for a structured summary, key admissions, and contradictions.
Try this prompt
Describe the parties, the deal, and the jurisdiction. Get a structured first draft to refine — never the final.
Try this prompt
Paste the clause; ask for a one-paragraph explanation a non-lawyer would understand.
Try this prompt
Paste both. Get a clause-by-clause diff with materiality assessment.
Try this prompt
Status updates, fee letters, engagement letters — AI gets you to 90% in seconds, you finish.
Try this prompt
Open MultipleChat and turn on AI Collaboration in the model selector.
Start with non-privileged work — internal summaries, drafting templates, plain-English explanations.
Set a personal rule: verify every citation, every quote, every statute before it leaves your screen.
Bring it to the firm. Train the team. Document the policies.
AI invents citations. Never include a citation AI produced without verifying it in a primary source. Use AI for drafting and structure, not for case finding. The court sanctions reported on the news involve lawyers who skipped this step.
Use enterprise-grade AI plans that do not train on your inputs. Anonymise where possible. Some jurisdictions have specific guidance — the ABA, the Law Society of England and Wales, and the Swiss Federal Office of Justice have all issued AI-use guidance for the profession.
Convention is still forming. Most firms bill the lawyer's time at standard rates, not the AI's. Increasingly, clients ask whether AI was used and expect the time savings to be reflected. Talk to your firm's risk committee.
Not the lawyering. The work-product industry around it is being compressed. Most senior lawyers see this as a productivity story, not a redundancy one.
Specialist tools (Lexis+ AI, Westlaw Edge AI) for primary law. General models (Claude, ChatGPT) for drafting and analysis. MultipleChat gets you the second category.
Yes, with care. Anonymise inputs. Verify every fact. Always read the output before sending.
Increasing best practice: tell clients you use AI as a tool, with your supervision and review. Many engagement letters now include this.
MultipleChat gives lawyers ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity in one workspace — and has them check each other before you use the answer.
Open MultipleChatAlso see: Free AI tools · AI glossary · AI for other professions
Continue learning
Use several frontier models together for stronger answers and fewer blind spots.
ComparisonCompare several AI answers side by side when the output matters.
PricingSee the AI subscription that replaces separate ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity accounts.
Multi-model AIRun the same prompt through available ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok models and compare their answers.
GuideChoose the best model for writing, research, coding, documents, images and business work.
AlternativeUse ChatGPT alternatives together: Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, files, web search and creation tools.
