Your session has been flagged for unusual activity.
Please confirm you're human to continue.
Summarise the bundle, draft the memo, and catch the citation that does not exist.
No credit card · ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity in one place
You already do half of this by hand: ask one model, paste the answer into another to check it. Here is what that turned up on a real task for paralegals.
Summarise the authority for this proposition and draft the memo section.
Auto Verification caught
One cited case could not be located in any database. A second existed but had been distinguished on the point it was cited for.
The models disagreed
One model read the precedent as directly on point.
Another said the facts are distinguishable and the court would likely say so.
A citation that does not exist is how attorneys end up sanctioned. This one never left the draft.
Dates, events and the document each one came from.
Try this prompt
The admissions, the contradictions, the quotable lines.
Try this prompt
A first draft with the structure a supervising attorney expects.
Try this prompt
Whether it says what they claim it says.
Try this prompt
Open MultipleChat and turn on AI Collaboration.
Upload the bundle or paste the transcript.
Ask for the chronology or summary with source references, not conclusions.
Verify every single citation before anything leaves your desk.
Yes, and lawyers have been sanctioned for filing the results. Ask it to mark propositions with [CITE] instead of producing authority, then verify every reference. The fact check flags what it cannot locate.
On paid plans nothing you upload trains a model and providers do not retain it. Follow your firm's own rules on client confidentiality first — they take precedence over any vendor assurance.
It replaces the first pass, not the judgement. The paralegals doing well with it are handling more matters, not fewer.
Yes, including scanned documents. Ask for page references so every claim can be traced back.
It is reliable for framing, structure and first drafts. It is not reliable on authority. That distinction is the whole job.
It can draft a structure and language for review. Filing anything it produced without verification is how people end up in the news.
Tell it to mark [CITE] rather than generate references, then let the verification pass find sources for each one. Anything it cannot support is flagged.
MultipleChat gives paralegals ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity in one workspace — and has them check each other before you use the answer.
Open MultipleChatAlso see: Free AI tools · AI glossary · AI for other professions
Continue learning
Use several frontier models together for stronger answers and fewer blind spots.
ComparisonCompare several AI answers side by side when the output matters.
PricingSee the AI subscription that replaces separate ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity accounts.
Multi-model AIRun the same prompt through available ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok models and compare their answers.
GuideChoose the best model for writing, research, coding, documents, images and business work.
AlternativeUse ChatGPT alternatives together: Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, files, web search and creation tools.
